US court in record fine for illegal file-sharing

The General Discussion forum has been setup to enable any kind of non-music discussions between the visitors of the website.

Moderators: Loopz, usernick, legspin, jof, the PLA

Post Reply
User avatar
memly
Meltdown
Posts: 2148
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:47 pm
antispam: No
Question: Orbital
Anti Spam: Orbital
Location: Going back in time
Contact:

US court in record fine for illegal file-sharing

Post by memly »

"In the first US trial to challenge the illegal downloading of music on the Internet, a single mother from Minnesota has been ordered to pay 220,000 dollars for sharing 24 songs online.

Jammie Thomas, 30, was the first among more than 26,000 people sued by the world's most powerful recording companies to refuse a settlement after being slapped with a lawsuit by the Recording Industry of America and six major music labels.

She turned down an offer to pay a few thousands dollars in fines and instead took the case to court.

Unlike some who insist on the right to share files over the Internet, Thomas says she was wrongfully targeted by SafeNet, a contractor employed by the recording industry to patrol the Internet for copyrighted material.

Her lawyer said earlier this week that she had racked up some 60,000 dollars in legal fees because she refused to be bullied.

And while Thomas insisted on the courthouse steps that she had never downloaded or uploaded music, her lawyer tried to convince jurors there was no way to prove who had uploaded songs on the Kazaa file sharing network.

A jury took just five hours to decide that evidence provided by the music labels showed otherwise and found Thomas guilty of copyright infringement, court records showed Thursday.

Thomas, an employee of the Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe, an Indian tribe, was ordered to pay a 9,250-dollar fine for each of 24 shared songs cited in the case, including Godsmack's "Spiral," Destiny's Child's "Bills, Bills, Bills" and Sara McLachlan's "Building a Mystery."

It could have been a lot worse.

The fine could have reached 150,000 dollars a song if the jury had found "willful" copyright infringement.

Had the record companies sued her for all 1,702 songs found in the online folder the fine could have run in the millions."


Shit!
I don't know you people...why are you here?
MEMS MUZAK
User avatar
Timbob
Monsters Exist!
Posts: 2271
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2005 12:17 am
antispam: No
Question: Orbital
Anti Spam: Orbital
Location: Breakfast with Karl Bartos.
Contact:

Post by Timbob »

1939 people downloaded the new underworld album i put on oink.
how much will that cost me?

anyway.
bah
it's stupid.
Image
It's 106 miles to Chicago.
We got a full tank of gas,
half a pack of cigarettes.
It's dark and we are wearing sunglasses
stylustrouble
Adnan
Posts: 563
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 9:03 am

Post by stylustrouble »

The fine was for having awful taste rather than for file-sharing.
Post Reply